• Home  
  • Musk v. Altman: AI Dupe or Conspirator?
- Artificial Intelligence

Musk v. Altman: AI Dupe or Conspirator?

Elon Musk testifies in court that he was duped into funding OpenAI, warning about the dangers of AI.

Musk v. Altman: AI Dupe or Conspirator?

Apple’s M4 Chip Is Here — And It’s Already Changing the Game

Apple’s M4 chip has arrived, embedded in the new iPad Pro, and it’s not just an incremental upgrade. This isn’t about faster web browsing or longer battery life — although you’ll get both. The M4 redefines what we expect from mobile computing, not just in performance, but in capability. It’s the first chip built for AI-native devices, and it arrives at a moment when the industry is scrambling to catch up.

What the M4 Actually Delivers

The M4 features a 10-core CPU, a 10-core GPU, and a 16-core Neural Engine. Apple says it delivers up to 1.5x faster CPU performance than the M2, and up to 4x faster machine learning inference. Real-world tests confirm it. The iPad Pro with M4 handles complex video editing, 3D rendering, and real-time AR with no throttling, even under sustained load. That’s rare in fanless devices.

But the real leap is in AI. The Neural Engine now supports hardware-accelerated AI models with up to 30 billion parameters — models that previously ran only on cloud servers or high-end desktops. On-device processing means no latency, no internet dependency, and full privacy. That changes everything for apps that rely on real-time intelligence.

Memory bandwidth has jumped to 120GB/s, and the chip uses second-generation 3nm process technology. That’s denser, more efficient, and allows Apple to pack more transistors — 28 billion — into the same footprint. More transistors mean more parallel processing, better multitasking, and room for features that haven’t even been invented yet.

Historical Context: From M1 to M4 in Just Four Years

Apple’s transition from Intel to Apple Silicon began in 2020 with the M1. That chip shocked the industry by matching high-end MacBook Pro performance in a MacBook Air, a device that never had a fan. The M1 wasn’t just faster — it was more efficient, more integrated, and showed Apple’s full-stack advantage: hardware and software designed together.

In 2022, the M2 refined that formula with better GPU performance and increased memory bandwidth. It powered the 13-inch MacBook Pro, the MacBook Air (M2), and eventually the 14- and 16-inch MacBooks. But it still felt like an evolution, not a revolution.

The M3, launched in late 2023, introduced dynamic caching, mesh shading, and hardware-accelerated ray tracing — features aimed squarely at pro users and game developers. It also brought the first 3nm process to market, a technical milestone few competitors had reached. The M3 series powered the MacBook Pro, iMac, and Mac mini, showing Apple could scale the architecture across form factors.

Now, just six months later, Apple has released the M4 — not in a Mac, but in the iPad Pro. That’s a shift in strategy. The M1 launched in Macs; the M4 launches in a tablet. That tells us Apple sees the iPad as the frontline device for next-gen computing, not just a media consumption tool. The timing matters. While rivals are still optimizing AI workloads for cloud offloading, Apple is building silicon that makes local processing not just viable, but superior.

What This Means For You

If you’re a developer, you’re no longer coding for underpowered mobile clients that depend on the cloud. With the M4, you can build apps that process large language models locally, process video in real time, or analyze sensor data without sending anything over the network. That opens new categories: offline AI assistants, instant translation earbuds with zero lag, AR navigation that works in remote areas.

Founders should rethink what a “minimum viable product” looks like. A startup building a medical transcription tool no longer needs a backend AI cluster. The M4 can run Whisper-level models directly on the device. That cuts infrastructure costs, reduces time to market, and simplifies compliance — especially in regulated industries where data can’t leave the device.

For hardware builders, the message is clear: integration wins. Apple’s edge isn’t just the chip — it’s the tight loop between silicon, operating system, and apps. Third-party manufacturers relying on off-the-shelf components can’t match that. If you’re designing a smart device, you’ll need to decide: build around Apple’s ecosystem, or invest in custom silicon of your own. There’s less middle ground now.

The Competitive Landscape: Who’s Behind and Why It Matters

Apple’s move puts pressure on every player in the ecosystem. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite, while promising, won’t ship in volume until mid-2024. Even then, its NPU performance — the part that handles AI tasks — peaks around 45 trillion operations per second (TOPS). The M4’s Neural Engine hits 38 TOPS, but Apple’s software optimizations mean real-world performance often exceeds the numbers.

Google’s Tensor chips, used in Pixel phones, focus on AI features like call screening and photo enhancement. But they’re not built for high-performance workloads. They rely heavily on cloud fallback. Tensor G4, expected later in 2024, may close the gap, but Google doesn’t have a tablet or laptop platform to match Apple’s breadth.

Intel and AMD are lagging further behind. Their latest chips include NPUs, but they’re afterthoughts — tacked on to existing CPU+GPU designs. They don’t have the unified memory architecture Apple uses, which means data shuttling between components creates bottlenecks. That’s fine for office productivity, but it breaks down under AI workloads.

Microsoft is caught in the middle. It’s betting big on AI with Copilot, but most Windows devices can’t run it locally. That means constant internet calls, latency, and privacy concerns. Even Surface devices with Snapdragon chips don’t match the iPad Pro’s performance-per-watt. Microsoft’s vision of “AI everywhere” depends on hardware it doesn’t control — a structural disadvantage.

This isn’t just about speed. It’s about control. Apple designs the silicon, the OS, the development tools, and the app store. When a developer optimizes for Core ML or Metal, they’re tapping into a full stack that’s been tuned for years. Competitors are still stitching together parts from different vendors. That fragmentation slows innovation.

Key Questions Remaining

Apple hasn’t answered several critical questions. First: when will the M4 come to Macs? The iPad Pro is a statement device, but the real test is whether this chip can scale to laptops and desktops. If Apple waits too long, it risks fragmenting its ecosystem — pro users may wonder why the iPad is more powerful than their MacBook.

Second: how will developers access the full potential of the Neural Engine? Apple provides frameworks like Core ML and Create ML, but documentation for 30-billion-parameter models is sparse. Developers need tools to quantize models, manage memory, and debug on-device AI pipelines. Without better support, only the largest studios will push the limits.

Third: what about battery? The M4 is efficient, but running large AI models constantly will drain even the largest iPad battery. Apple claims “all-day” AI use, but real-world tests are still limited. If users have to charge midday to use AI features, adoption will stall.

Fourth: will this deepen the divide between Apple and everyone else? iOS and iPadOS are already walled gardens. With the M4, Apple is accelerating ahead in on-device AI, making its devices better at handling sensitive tasks. That could attract enterprise users, but it also makes interoperability harder. A hospital using Apple devices for patient transcription won’t want to switch to Android tablets that can’t run the same apps locally.

Finally, what’s next? The M4 is built on 3nm, but TSMC is already preparing 2nm, expected in 2025. Will Apple push the envelope again next year, or consolidate? The pace of innovation is unsustainable for most companies — but Apple’s vertical integration might let it keep going.

What Happens Next

The M4 isn’t just a chip. It’s a signal. Apple is moving fast, and it’s not waiting for the industry to catch up. The choice of the iPad Pro as the launch vehicle suggests a shift in how we think about computing: the future isn’t laptops with AI features, it’s AI-first devices that happen to have screens.

We’ll likely see the M4 or M4X in the MacBook lineup by late 2024. When that happens, the performance delta between Mac and PC will widen again. Windows OEMs will respond with more Snapdragon devices, but they’ll struggle to match the software integration.

Developers will start building apps that assume high-end local AI. We’ll see new categories emerge — personal AI coaches that learn your habits, design tools that generate assets in real time, translation apps that work flawlessly in noisy environments. These won’t just be features; they’ll be expectations.

But there’s a risk. If Apple locks down access to the Neural Engine too tightly, innovation could stall. The early Mac App Store was criticized for restrictive guidelines. Apple can’t afford to repeat that with AI. It needs to empower developers, not just showcase its own capabilities.

The M4 changes the game because it makes powerful AI personal, private, and instant. That’s not just better tech — it’s a new computing model. The question isn’t whether others will follow. It’s whether they can.

About AI Post Daily

Independent coverage of artificial intelligence, machine learning, cybersecurity, and the technology shaping our future.

Contact: Get in touch

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, and to analyze traffic. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.